Salespeople can learn a lot by observing poker players. Every gambler knows who wins each hand of poker: the player who possesses the highest value set of cards, or who is the last remaining player if everyone else folds. However, a more challenging question is: in each hand of poker, who comes in second?

The correct answer is: the player who folded first. That player invested the least in a losing hand, and therefore lost the lowest amount compared to the other players.

Unfortunately, some salespeople would make poor poker players. They often invest too much time and resources trying to close sales opportunities that offer a low chance of success. According to one recent survey1, salespeople lose more than half of their sales opportunities, on average, either to direct competitors or to buyers deciding to do nothing at all.

Refusing to fold

Why do sellers pursue poor quality opportunities? Some of the most common reasons include:

  • Fear of pipeline reduction – often, managers evaluate salespeople not only by how much they close, but also by the value of potential opportunities they are working on. Many salespeople are reluctant to leave an opportunity because that will reduce their cumulative pipeline value, which reflects negatively on them.
  • You can’t win if you don’t play – too many salespeople treat sales opportunities like lotteries: even if they have a low chance of winning, they continue to play, in hope of being awarded the business. These sellers do not realize they are squandering their most limited and precious resource – time – in too many unqualified deals. Their win rate would be likely to improve if they invested more time in higher qualified opportunities.
  • No objective standards – too many salespeople lack a clear set of evaluation standards for deciding if they should exit a sales opportunity and rely on qualitative readings of buyer behavior. Emotional instincts and intuition can be useful, and should not be ignored, but they are insufficient to predict sales success consistently.
  • Poor evaluation criteria – too many salespeople use insufficient criteria for determining if a sales opportunity is qualified and worth further investment. The most popular set of opportunity qualification criteria is BANT: Budget, Authority, Need and Time. Many sellers believe that if a buyer can provide clear answers to BANT criteria, then that opportunity is worth pursuing. Unfortunately, using BANT alone can be misleading, and result in poor qualification decisions.

 

Full access available for logged users only. Log in or select the best subscription option here..

Log in Order a subscription
Favorites Print

Also check

5 factors of success in B2B selling

SELL_11_28.jpg

In our book, The Collaborative Sale1, my colleague Keith Eades and I looked closely at the behaviors of top performing sales professionals, especially those selling business-to-business (B2B) solutions. We identified how exceptional sellers align with modern buyer preferences, and we described various methods for achieving strong results consistently.

Read more

Creative thinking techniques

SELL_11_24.jpg

A business presentation is just getting started. The salesperson turns to the first slide and says: “Good morning! My name is John Smith and I would like to tell you a few words about our company.” After such an introduction, we already know how this presentation will go and that nothing will surprise us. We’ll be bored for the next half hour...

Read more
Open access no. 11/2020

The fastest way to be a memorable salesperson

SELL_11_20.jpeg

In sales, being memorable matters! You work much too hard and put in far too many hours to let yourself be easily forgotten. You don’t want to be part of the ho-hum background noise in other peoples’ lives. You’re better than that. You have more to offer than that. And it’s time you made some simple changes to how you present yourself so the impression you make is a lasting one.

Read more

Go to

Partners

Advertisement